“Han Shot First” is important (not for the reasons you think)

Han Shot First 3The Cantina is one of the iconic locations in the original Star Wars. In the center of Mos Eisley, the “wretched hive of scum and villainy” there’s a seedy tavern where Obi-Wan and Luke meet Han and Chewbacca, Han fights off and over-eager bounty hunter, and we see the first of many limbs being chopped off in the Star Wars franchise. If you know a thing or two about Star Wars, you’d recognize that second detail I mentioned as the “Han Shot First” scene. For the unfamiliar, when Greedo, a bounty hunter, threatens to shoot Han, Han subtly draws his blaster and shoots him first. This was infamously changed in the 2004 re-release of A New Hope. Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the two editions of Han’s encounter with Greedo:

“Han shot first” is the battlecry for all Star Wars fanboys who believe that George Lucas’ changes effectively tarnished the original trilogy. Some of them were unnecessary, some of them weren’t. But as far as many Star Wars fans are concerned, any changes to the original trilogy are bad changes.

The way George Lucas justified Greedo shooting first was this:

Han Solo was going to marry Leia, and you look back and say “Should he be a cold-blooded killer?” Because I was thinking mythologically – should he be a cowboy, should he be John Wayne? And I said “Yeah, he should be John Wayne.” And when you’re John Wayne, you don’t shoot people [first] – you have to let them have the first shot. It’s a mythological reality that we hope our society pays attention to.

The issue is one of characterization. Lucas wants to characterize Han as a bold hero who unflinchingly waits to shoot Greedo until after Greedo has shot at him first. He essentially wants to characterize Han Solo as John Wayne. This makes perfect sense, because aside from sci-fi and samurai movies, the clearest influence on Star Wars is very clearly the tradition of cowboy movies, and this is demonstrated in the quote above. John Wayne westerns were clearly on George Lucas’ mind when he made the original film. The early scenes of the original Star Wars and the most beloved John Wayne classic, The Searchers; the cinematography of the moments when John Wayne’s character Ethan finds his friends dead and when Luke finds his aunt and uncle dead are similar, almost shot-for-shot. They can be side-by-side in this video. So John Wayne’s influence on Star Wars is abundantly apparent.

The important counterpoint I offer to the John Wayne argument is the same one that the Western genre offered to John Wayne in the mid-1960’s: Clint Eastwood.


John Wayne’s most famous movie is The Searchers – he plays a rancher who heroically searches for a kidnapped girl. Compare this to Clint Eastwood’s most famous movie, The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, in which he plays a treasure hunter who isn’t afraid of double crossing and killing his way to a great sum of money hidden in the American West. Perhaps you see where I’m going with this.

In this interview with James Lipton, Clint explains the necessity of shooting first. Lipton explains that Clint’s the Man with No Name character from The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly muddied the waters as far as character morality goes; he wasn’t a black-or-white character. When Lipton notes that No Name didn’t wait for the other guys to shoot first, Clint retorts:

Yeah, well, it doesn’t make sense, why would you wait for somebody to [shoot]? In American Westerns, I could never understand that. I remember Don Siegel got in trouble when he was doing a movie called The Shootist some years later and he was working with John Wayne. The villain sneaks around the room and John Wayne comes up behind him and then [Siegel] says, “And then you shoot him.” After a long pause John Wayne says “You mean I shoot him in the back?” And he says “Yeah,” and Wayne says “I [John Wayne] don’t shoot anyone in the back.” And Don made a terrible error and said “Clint Eastwood would have shot him.”

Han Shot First 2

Clint Eastwood and John Wayne are easily the two most iconic cowboy actors of the great age of the Western. For the most part, they embody two different characters; the respectable lawman and the rogue bounty hunter (and sometimes outlaw). Since Star Wars clearly takes influence from Westerns, it makes sense for Han Solo to emulate one of these characters, doesn’t it? And sure, by the end of the trilogy, Han is a hero and gets the girl, but he starts off as a smuggler just trying to get enough money to pay off his bounty. Now, does that sound like John Wayne to you? Of course not. It makes sense to start this character off with a killing that is simultaneously self-defense and cold-blooded murder. The Han’s original trilogy character arc is the story of him starting off as Clint Eastwood and gradually becoming John Wayne. If you say he wouldn’t shoot first at the end of the trilogy, you’re probably right. But if you think he wouldn’t shoot first at the beginning of the trilogy, you’re probably wrong. When Han waits to shoot, his character arc means less. He’s no longer a bad guy learning to be good, he’s an all right guy learning to be good. I just think it’s a shame that George Lucas decided to change this, and I think it’s a shame that the Star Wars fandom thinks that Greedo shooting first is bad because it “makes Han seem less badass” or because any change to the original movie is an affront to some unthinkably perfect movie.

Obviously, this doesn’t make or break Star Wars, it’s still one of the greatest and most influential movies ever made. But in a movie that relies so heavily on its inspiration from cowboys and samurais and medieval knights, this feels like a misstep. I think this brings up an interesting question; how much influence should a creator have on a character after that character is debuted? And what do you think? Was Lucas right in making Han seem more heroic, like John Wayne, or did Han Shoot First?

15 thoughts on ““Han Shot First” is important (not for the reasons you think)

  1. Great read and I agree with you – Han starting bad and turning good makes for a better character arc. I hadn’t noticed how bad the effects are in the new version until that video, Han looks like a mannequin or dummy just after he’s shot!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yeah, you’re absolutely right. It’s things like this that actually indicate the merits of the 2004 re-release that retouched special effects that had aged. It’s funny to think that these effects were so mind-blowing in 1977.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Yeah I find it really interesting when you have sequels that actually seem to look worse than their older predecessors – Jurassic park is perhaps the best example, which for me peaked at #1 and has gone downhill ever since! I’ve always thought it’s weird that some people are so much more attuned to picking out CGI in films

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Excellent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you are just
    extremely excellent. I really like what you’ve acquired here, certainly like what you are saying and the
    way in which you say it. You make it enjoyable and you still care for to keep
    it sensible. I can’t wait to read much more from you.
    This is actually a wonderful site.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. First of all I want to say wonderful blog! I had a quick question in which I’d like to ask
    if you don’t mind. I was interested to find out how you center yourself
    and clear your head prior to writing. I’ve had a hard time clearing my mind
    in getting my ideas out there. I do enjoy writing
    but it just seems like the first 10 to 15 minutes are wasted just trying to figure out how to begin. Any suggestions or hints?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hey Sewa! What a wonderful comment! I just want to say, first and foremost, thank you so much for reading.
      And I don’t know if this is particularly helpful for me to share, but let me try to share how my posts start. My writing process starts with me settling on a topic, and from there usually goes one of two ways. The first way (which is definitely less common) involves sitting down and just writing whatever comes to mind in one huge burst.
      The other way (pretty much the way all my posts go) is that I’ll come up with the topic and generally outline what I want to say with the post, adding to it and editing it whenever I get time. Usually that involves me writing down chunks on my phone whenever I have an idle moment and I’m waiting around, and then bringing all these thoughts together and editing it until it comes across as one cohesive post.
      That’s the way I tend to form my posts and articles – I can’t guarantee it’ll help you, but maybe it’s worth a try.
      Thanks again for reading! 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s